Your browser doesn't support javascript.

Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde


Home > Pesquisa > ()
Imprimir Exportar

Formato de exportação:


Adicionar mais destinatários
| |

Integrated epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals TP63 as a novel player in clinically aggressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Papakonstantinou, Nikos; Ntoufa, Stavroula; Tsagiopoulou, Maria; Moysiadis, Theodoros; Bhoi, Sujata; Malousi, Andigoni; Psomopoulos, Fotis; Mansouri, Larry; Laidou, Stamatia; Papazoglou, Despoina; Gounari, Maria; Pasentsis, Konstantinos; Plevova, Karla; Kuci-Emruli, Venera; Duran-Ferrer, Marti; Davis, Zadie; Ek, Sara; Rossi, Davide; Gaidano, Gianluca; Ritgen, Matthias; Oscier, David; Stavroyianni, Niki; Pospisilova, Sarka; Davi, Frederic; Ghia, Paolo; Hadzidimitriou, Anastasia; Belessi, Chrysoula; Martin-Subero, Jose I; Pott, Christiane; Rosenquist, Richard; Stamatopoulos, Kostas.
Int J Cancer; 2018 Nov 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30447004
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) stereotyped subsets #6 and #8 include cases expressing unmutated B cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) (U-CLL). Subset #6 (IGHV1-69/IGKV3-20) is less aggressive compared to subset #8 (IGHV4-39/IGKV1(D)-39) which has the highest risk for Richter's transformation among all CLL. The underlying reasons for this divergent clinical behavior are not fully elucidated. To gain insight into this issue, here we focused on epigenomic signatures and their links with gene expression, particularly investigating genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in subsets #6 and #8 as well as other U-CLL cases not expressing stereotyped BcR IG. We found that subset #8 showed a distinctive DNA methylation profile compared to all other U-CLL cases, including subset #6. Integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression revealed significant correlation for several genes, particularly highlighting a relevant role for the TP63 gene which was hypomethylated and overexpressed in subset #8. This observation was validated by quantitative PCR, which also revealed TP63 mRNA overexpression in additional non-subset U-CLL cases. BcR stimulation had distinct effects on p63 protein expression, particularly leading to induction in subset #8, accompanied by increased CLL cell survival. This pro-survival effect was also supported by siRNA-mediated downregulation of p63 expression resulting in increased apoptosis. In conclusion, we report that DNA methylation profiles may vary even among CLL patients with similar somatic hypermutation status, supporting a compartmentalized approach to dissecting CLL biology. Furthermore, we highlight p63 as a novel prosurvival factor in CLL, thus identifying another piece of the complex puzzle of clinical aggressiveness. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Selo DaSilva