Your browser doesn't support javascript.

Biblioteca Virtual en Salud


Home > Búsqueda > ()
Imprimir Exportar

Formato de exportación:


Adicionar mas contactos
| |

Quality-of-care audits and perinatal mortality in South Africa.

Allanson, Emma R; Pattinson, Robert C.
Bull World Health Organ; 93(6): 424-8, 2015 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26240464


Suboptimal care contributes to perinatal mortality rates. Quality-of-care audits can be used to identify and change suboptimal care, but it is not known if such audits have reduced perinatal mortality in South Africa.


We investigated perinatal mortality trends in health facilities that had completed at least five years of quality-of-care audits. In a subset of facilities that began audits from 2006, we analysed modifiable factors that may have contributed to perinatal deaths. LOCAL


Since the 1990s, the perinatal problem identification programme has performed quality-of-care audits in South Africa to record perinatal deaths, identify modifiable factors and motivate change. RELEVANT CHANGES Five years of continuous audits were available for 163 facilities. Perinatal mortality rates decreased in 48 facilities (29%) and increased in 52 (32%). Among the subset of facilities that began audits in 2006, there was a decrease in perinatal mortality of 30% (16/54) but an increase in 35% (19/54). Facilities with increasing perinatal mortality were more likely to identify the following contributing factors patient delay in seeking help when a baby was ill (odds ratio, OR 4.67; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.99-10.97); lack of use of antenatal steroids (OR 9.57; 95% CI 2.97-30.81); lack of nursing personnel (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.34-5.33); fetal distress not detected antepartum when the fetus is monitored (OR 2.92; 95% CI 1.47-5.8) and poor progress in labour with incorrect interpretation of the partogram (OR 2.77; 95% CI 1.43-5.34). LESSONS LEARNT Quality-of-care audits were not shown to improve perinatal mortality in this study.
Selo DaSilva